AI in the real world

When AI underdelivers, the workflow is usually the problem.

If your team is still rekeying documents, second-guessing reports, or manually holding a pilot together, the model is not the main issue. The workflow, inputs, and trust conditions are.

96.7%
Extraction accuracy
4h+
Saved per manager / week
~73%
Critical error reduction
MI

Where enterprise AI starts costing more than it delivers

The AI investment is already made. The business result still isn't there.

The pilot looked promising. The license is live. But reporting still gets questioned, document-heavy work still needs rekeying, and the workflow still depends on manual intervention to stay standing.

Reporting still slows decisions

It's Monday morning. Three dashboards show three different numbers. The meeting starts in 20 minutes, and no one can explain which report is right. Managers spend 4+ hours a week rebuilding decks no one fully trusts.

Document-heavy work is hiding cost

Your team rekeyed data from 47 PDFs into a spreadsheet on Tuesday. By Thursday, three errors surfaced in the downstream report. Nobody knows which PDF caused them. Manual processing felt safe — the 12.1% error rate was invisible.

A promising pilot can't survive operations

The demo was impressive. Then came exceptions, handoffs, approvals, and three-team coordination. Now it runs on invisible manual glue, and no one wants to admit the license fees are running whether the value is there or not.

Why buyers trust us

Why buyers trust us with high-consequence workflows

This work touches reporting, clinical data, and operating processes where mistakes are expensive. Here is why organizations trust Marquee with it.

Dual Microsoft MVP

One of 4 people worldwide with dual MVP in Data Platform & AI Platform.

Enterprise experience

24 years at Microsoft, Starbucks, Wachovia (Wells Fargo), and Inmar.

Published authority

Seven technology books. MBA from Wake Forest.

Where enterprise AI breaks

The model isn't the problem. The work around it is.

Most enterprise AI underdelivers in the same four places. Which one sounds like yours?

Where we see the most hidden cost

Critical data trapped in documents.

PDFs, medical records, invoices, and contracts still drive core processes. When information stays trapped, teams read, rekey, correct, and reconcile by hand — hiding cost and multiplying downstream error.

Document Intelligence
Where decisions stall

Reporting that leaders don't trust.

When numbers change depending on the report, owner, or meeting, the organization slows down. Time gets spent debating definitions and rebuilding confidence instead of making decisions.

Reporting Trust
Also common

Too many AI ideas. Too few worth funding.

Without a disciplined screen, budget gets spread across attractive ideas that never create durable value.

AI Priority Audit
Also common

Pilots that collapse in real operations.

The pilot worked in a controlled environment. Then exceptions, handoffs, and invisible manual glue showed up.

Production Readiness

What has to become true

AI becomes useful when the surrounding workflow becomes usable.

01

A real workflow has to be worth fixing

The best starting point is the decision, bottleneck, or document-heavy process where better information would change an actual business outcome.

02

The inputs have to be dependable

If the underlying information is trapped, inconsistent, or incomplete, the AI layer scales confusion faster.

03

The output has to be trusted enough to use

If leaders still need to double-check the result before acting, the system hasn't earned the right to change decisions.

04

The workflow has to survive operations

Handoffs, exceptions, ownership, and visibility determine whether the process becomes part of the business or just another fragile workaround.

Real workflows. Measured results.

The value came from fixing the workflow, not layering on more AI.

96.7%
Medical record extraction accuracy
Before Manual processing felt safe. Nobody had measured the error rate. It was 12.1% — flowing silently into downstream clinical decisions.
After Validated AI extraction with exception handling designed for document variability. ~73% fewer critical errors. AI outperformed the manual process.
Read the case study
4h+
Saved per manager, per week
Before Each manager spent 4+ hours weekly rebuilding leadership decks. Copy-paste from multiple sources. Numbers that didn't always match.
After Structured Copilot workflow producing consistent, repeatable reports. Managers got time back. Leadership got numbers they could act on.
How we fix Copilot value
Visible
Operational visibility for AI model releases
Before Complex, multi-team release process with hidden coordination costs. Unclear handoffs. Visibility gaps creating unnecessary risk.
After Redesigned operating process with defined handoffs, clear accountability, and visible coordination across teams.
How we fix AI operations
"We thought our process was working. Marquee showed us what it was actually costing — and built something that leadership could trust without second-guessing."

— Director of Clinical Informatics, Global Healthcare Organization

Copilot reality

If Copilot is disappointing, the issue is not Copilot.

At $30/user/month, a 500-seat organization spends $180,000 a year on Copilot. Every month without measurable ROI is another $15K your CFO will question.

  • No one agreed which workflows were worth improving first
  • The information feeding prompts is incomplete or trapped in documents
  • Output sounds plausible but isn't reliable enough to use without extra checking
  • No one defined what measurable improvement should look like
More training won't fix this. Better prompts won't fix this. The workflow underneath the tool has to become clearer, cleaner, and easier to trust.

We find the one workflow where Copilot can produce measurable, repeatable value — then build the foundation that makes it work.

See the Copilot reality page

Honest answers

Why not just...

You're weighing alternatives. You should. Here's what we've seen happen with each — and why they tend to leave the root problem in place.

"...do more Copilot training?"

Training teaches people to use the tool. It doesn't repair unclear use cases, weak data, or broken workflows. If the foundation isn't ready, training accelerates frustration.

"...buy software to solve it?"

Software doesn't fix broken use cases, poor information quality, or outputs nobody trusts. If it did, your current tools would already be working.

"...handle it with our internal team?"

Your internal team knows the business deeply. What they may lack is cross-industry pattern recognition — seeing the same failure modes across dozens of organizations and knowing exactly where to intervene first.

"...wait until the technology matures?"

The license fees are running whether the value is there or not. And foundation problems — bad data, unclear use cases, untrusted reporting — compound with time. They don't resolve on their own.

Buying questions

The questions serious buyers need answered.

This work sits between strategy, workflow design, data reality, and implementation. The right questions are about fit, scope, and what changes.

No junior staff. The person who scopes the work is the person who does the work. You get senior judgment on a specific stuck workflow, clearer business framing, and faster movement from diagnosis to change — without layers of theater around it.
With the workflow that's already creating visible friction: a document-heavy process, reporting no one trusts, an AI use-case backlog that lacks discipline, or a pilot that can't survive operations.
Both. The AI Priority Audit is diagnostic. Document Intelligence, Reporting Trust, and Production Readiness include implementation. You get working systems, not reports.
That depends on document variability, validation approach, and exception handling. In a medical records workflow, we reached 96.7% against a measured human baseline of 87.9%. The point isn't a vanity number — it's reaching a level of trust the business can act on.

Bring us the workflow where AI still isn't delivering.

We'll tell you where it is breaking, whether it is fixable, and what the smartest first step is.

Request a workflow review →

You'll receive a written assessment with a clear recommendation within 2 business days.